COMPARISON
READ
BETWEEN
A MOVEABLE FEAST BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY
AND
THE PARIS WIFE BY PAULA McLAIN
West
Maui Book Club Comparison Read Discussion Questions:
1
If ever there
were a Òhe said, she saidÓ opportunity, reading and comparing these two novels
would surely be a fine example.
Both fictions
cover the same early to mid-1920Õs era.
Both books pertain to the same people. And, both books leave us with impressions as to how people
lived, loved, survived, aspired or did not aspire, while living in Paris during
a time of great literary expansion.
I underlined and italicized the word ÒfictionÓ to underscore the
significance of this to both writers.
Hemingway had several false starts with his AMF
introduction in the 1964 version but in ÒThe Restored EditionÓ of 2009,
HemingwayÕs introduction was removed. Instead, Sean Hemingway wrote one,
however, in the ÒFragmentsÓ section, the editor et el did include many of the
statements Hemingway was trying to write in his introduction: ÒThis book is fictionÉThis book is all fictionÉIt
was necessary to write as fiction rather than factÉÓ There are more on file at the JFK
Library in Boston.
McLain also wrote her book as a work of historical
fiction based on actual letters, etc. but states well that Òapart from the well-known actual people,
events, and locales that figure in the narrative, all names, characters,
places, and incidents are the products of the authorÕs imagination or are used
fictitiouslyÉÓ.
Was it easier to see why both writers chose to do
literary fiction verses nonfiction?
And while reading both fictions, did you ever loose sight of this
fact?
2
Would you
agree that both novels are first and foremost love stories? McLain writes in her ÒA Note On
SourcesÓ that ÒThe
true story of the HemingwayÕs marriage is so dramatic and compelling, and has
been so beautifully treated by Ernest Hemingway himself in A Moveable Feast, that my
intention became to push deeper into the emotional lives of the characters and
bring new insight to historical events, while staying faithful to the
facts.Ó
3
Both novels
elaborate on the lost suitcase of manuscripts, stories and carbons that Hadley
was bringing to Ernest. How do the
two accounts compare? Who suffered
more as a result? And, did you
feel McLain or Hemingway thought it was damaging or constructive to his
rewrite?
4
The Paris Wife is a story more about their personal account as
husband/wife and how it all ended; while A Moveable Feast is more about the times,
people, and actions of the day.
Assuming you read the more personal account first, were you able to
insert McLainÕs view point into the accounts Hemingway gave in certain stories
like, ÒHawks Do Not ShareÓ, a story written about the FitzgeraldÕs and he
mentions PaulineÕs name for the very first time and without reference as to who
she is and how she came to be mentioned?
However, if you read A Moveable Feast first, did you wonder whom Pauline
was? Do you think if the order of
the stories were different, you would then have better known who she was?
5
Both novels talk
of Gertrude Stein but the experiences Hadley and Hemingway shared with her were
dynamically different. Hadley
– the wife – sat and spoke with SteinÕs life partner, Alice Toklas,
while Hemingway mentored brilliantly under Stein. Both novels share the two accounts but do they do so on
equal terms? How did Hadley feel by way of McLainÕs take on it and how did
Hemingway express his feelings when he wrote about it?
6
Hemingway, a
most noted writer of his time, lived and worked on AMF until 1961, leaving it
unfinished. It was posthumously
published by his 4th wife Mary Hemingway in 1964 and then restored
in 2009. McLain published TPW in
2011. Do you think each novel
complimented the other, or not? Do
you think one novel over the other paid more or less tribute to Hadley over
Hemingway? If so, whose version of the accounts do you better accept? Consider especially HemingwayÕs chapters ÓThe Pilot Fish and the
RichÓ and ÒNada y Pues NadaÓ (Nothing is for nothingÉ.that was part of his
original introduction in the 1964 publication of AMF) and where he generally blames
Pauline for the breakup and not himself.
7
Did reading and
comparing both novels provide a better reading experience for you? Did it indeed give you that Òhe said,
she saidÓ experience? Would you
want to do more comparison readings?
If so, what would they be?
Ex: The Grapes of Wrath vs The Worst Hard Times
To Kill A
Mockingbird vs The Help
A MOVEABLE FEAST BY
ERNEST HEMINGWAY
Discussion questions from www.Litlovers.com
1. What do you make of Hemingway's remark in his Preface: If the reader prefers, this may be
regarded as fiction. But there is always the chance that such a book of fiction
may throw some light on what has been written as fact. What is he saying? Is he suggesting
little of none of his memoir is true? (Don't worry if you're not sure: no one
is—the line is a bit of a puzzle.)
2. Given his later renown and personal excesses (alcoholism,
braggadocio and bluster, womanizing, meanness), what do you make of this young
Hemingway? How would you describe him? Is he a likable? Admirable?
3. What was the relationship between Hemingway and his first wife,
Hadley, as described in A Moveable Feast? Where do you see the fault lines of
their marriage? What part did horse racing play? Some have surmised that Hadley
was the one woman (wife) he truly loved. What happened?
4. Talk about Hemingway's depictions of the famous literary
characters in his Paris circle of friends. Whom do you find most interesting?
What does he say, for instance, about F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald? Some
readers have found his observations (even his treatment) cruel; others see
Hemingway as honest if acerbic. What do you think?
5. Which episodes do you find particularly funny—perhaps the
luncheon incident with Ford Madox Ford? Or Ezra Pound? Or the trip to Lyons
with Fitzgerald?
6. Writing from a distance of some 30 years, Hemingway paints a
beauty, even glamour, in being poor and hungry...in Paris...at that moment. Why
does this seem to have been such a happy time for him? What lends this work its
twilight nostalgia?
7. Talk about the writing ritual Hemingway describes when he was
struggling to write his first volume of short stories and his first novel, The Sun Also Rises. What kind of discipline and commitment does it take to persevere
when his stories were returned by the publishers. In his final years
Hemingway's talent had fallen off, and he found himself unable to create a
great novel. Does that knowledge affect how you view his vigor during those
early years?
8. In the last chapter of A Moveable Feast, Hemingway refuses to accept
responsibility for the failure of his marriage, painting himself almost as a
victim of Pauline's machinations. How do you feel about Hemingway's
explanation?
9.Continuing with Question #8: This original account of
Hemingway's betrayal was heavily edited by his fourth wife, Mary, who some
surmise may have had a reason for the particular shape the chapter took.
But a newly expanded and altered edition was issued in 2009 by
Hemingway's grandson. In the new version the final chapter
differs—Hemingway admits his culpability in betraying Hadley. Does
knowing this change things, does it alter your answer to Question #8?
10. Have you read any of Hemingway's novels or short stories
(which some scholars consider his finest writing)? If so, does reading A Moveable Feast affect how you read his fiction? If you
have not other Hemingway works, does this book inspire you to do so?
(Questions by LitLovers.
Please feel free to use them, online or off, with attribution. Thanks.)
THE PARIS WIFE BY
PAULA McLAIN
Discussion questions from www.randomhouse.com
READER'S GROUP GUIDE